Members of the Jersey Funds Association reflect on the changing US regulatory landscape for private funds, what it means for fund managers, and how the changes are providing an opportunity for managers to re-think their structuring solutions to suit investor demands…

Regulatory shifts in the US private funds market have certainly created a huge amount of discussion in recent months, with managers continuing to get to grips with what the changes mean.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced last year a set of amendments to the 1940 Investment Advisers Act – a lengthy set of proposals relevant to private fund advisors, the implications of which have taken sometime to filter through to the US manager community.

Aimed at creating a fairer environment with improved fee transparency, the rules – which follow those already in place for hedge funds - introduce enhanced regulation for private fund advisors and added rules around portfolio transparency and ‘democratising’ fee structures, representing a significant shift in private market industry practice.

Amongst the various provisions in those amendments, for example, is a requirement for quarterly reporting, something that may not be as straightforward as some managers had initially thought.

The changes have heralded calls from managers for further guidance on issues where further clarification is needed, and where some of the rules have the potential to create additional complexity for private fund advisors and added compliance costs. From an investor perspective, there is also the potential for preferential rates being offered to their peers, presenting further associated issues.

The result is a divided US private fund landscape, with as many groups, trade bodies and associations supporting the new rules as there are opposed to them – and there is a chance that the changes might be the end of it, if calls to reconsider are met with open ears.

Domiciles in Focus

In the wake of the rule changes, US managers have undoubtedly increased their enquiries relating to their domicile choices, taking the view that they can mitigate their administrative burden by revisiting their administration, structuring and governance frameworks.

“This is a period of concern for US managers and domiciles have come into focus as part of manager considerations,” says JFA committee member and Mourant Partner Alistair Horn.

“When it comes to transparency requirements, particularly around fees, they want certainty, security and guarantees from their domiciles that their structures can stand up to international regulatory scrutiny – and in some cases, stress tests with the more traditional existing jurisdictional partners in the Caribbean have not filled them with confidence.”

Jersey’s Solution

From Jersey’s point of view, this has provided an opportunity to remind US managers that it can provide advantages over other jurisdictions for private fund structures, including those in the Caribbean, in particular when it comes to high standards of governance and an ability to demonstrate genuine substance.

Key advantages include:

·        Lower cost of formation and maintenance, with no requirement for a Jersey Private Fund (JPF) to appoint an auditor. This makes the JPF regime cost-effective and quick to set up compared to Private Fund regimes in other jurisdictions.

·        Tax neutrality and great credentials on compliance with international standards

·        An internationally respected regulatory environment for funds, with robust and clear requirements around appointing directors and service providers

·        Investor familiarity, especially when marketing into the EU

Further detail around the Jersey Private Fund regime compared to other domiciles can be found here.

To bring this further to life, in 2023, the net asset value of regulated funds under administration in Jersey grew to almost US$600bn, while the Jersey Private Fund continued cemented its position as  a go-to vehicle for professional investors, with 645 registered in total.

The jurisdiction also continued to see an ever-increasing community of managers fully resident in the island across private equity, hedge fund, venture capital, debt and real estate with these managers bringing a real depth and diversity to the industry at a time when substance remains high on the agenda.

Jersey’s platform as a gateway to EU investor capital through private placement has also remained strong. Today more than 200 non-EU managers –including those in the US and UK - are using the private placement route through Jersey to access Europe. It’s a figure that has grown by around 60% in five years, without the hassle and expense of full onshore AIFMD compliance.

“The SEC rule changes have acted as a prompt for US managers to take stock, re-evaluate and look elsewhere for opportunities, and, as all the indicators, data and figures reflect, Jersey is absolutely able to meet that call. In fact, it is already doing so,” explains Michael Johnson, JFA Chair and Group Head of Institutional Services at Crestbridge.

In particular the issue of governance remains pivotal, says Dilmun Leach, JFA Committee member and Partner at Walkers:

“At the heart of all this is depth of expertise, substance and governance, and this is where Jersey really excels. Ultimately what managers want is peace of mind, and Jersey delivers on that. The JPF is incredibly quick and cost-effective to set up, the regulatory environment is clear and unambiguous, and the expertise available, including a number of one-stop shops who can hand-hold managers through the process, is truly market leading. For many US managers, it’s proving a breath of fresh air.”

What Next

The US regulatory landscape will no doubt continue to evolve this year –but regardless of whether these latest SEC rule changes are maintained in full, in portion or not at all, the change has already prompted managers to revisit their structures, question the status quo and begin to ask questions as to whether their existing positions are the best possible solutions for investors.

Given its well-established governance and substance credentials, its global distribution capabilities and its finely honed regulatory ecosystem, Jersey is well placed to support those US managers looking for an alternative and viable solution that can support them with both their global compliance obligations and their investor aims in the long run.